COSTFRAME VS. FINOUT
Allocation and tagging vs. developer-centric waste resolution.
Halt the tagging projects. Solve the actual underlying waste first.
Finout is built for allocation, showback, and FinOps reporting across complex environments. Costframe is built for faster Azure cost audits: find waste, attach evidence, price savings at your net rate, and give teams a clear action queue.
Finance-Grade Instrument
- ✓Metric evidence attached directly to findings to prove they are safe.
- ✓Direct calculation of net vs list savings to match your actual billing.
- ✓Completely automated, zero-config onboarding for multi-sub setups.
Alternative Approach
- ✕Requires intensive, manual cost-allocation and tagging setups.
- ✕Presents alerts without granular metric evidence for platform engineering.
- ✕Lacks structured workflows to tracking finding verification states.
When Finout is the better choice
Finout may be better if your main problem is large-scale allocation, Kubernetes unit economics, or mature enterprise showback.
The Money Argument: Estimates vs. Evidence
How Costframe transforms vague recommendation alerts into verified, developer-trusted actions.
"Downsize VM vm-prod-db-01. Suggested action: move to standard D2s_v5. Projected retail list savings: ~€150/mo. Confidence: High."
"Re-tier Oversized compute vm-prod-db-01. Max CPU over 30 days is 6.2%. Continuous memory ceiling at 21%. Move to E2ds_v5."
Feature Comparison
Direct feature breakdown for audit integrity and risk control.
| Capability | Costframe | Finout |
|---|---|---|
| Automated utilization evidence | ✓ | ✕ |
| SKU-to-SKU price ratio sizing | ✓ | ✕ |
| Lightweight, read-only onboarding | ✓ | ✓ |
| Platform-independent validation states | ✓ | ✕ |
Find your wasted cloud spend
Connect a read-only subscription and receive your prioritized audit in minutes.