Skip to content
Costframe

Read the case for a change.

Find the resource worth investigating, inspect its evidence and agree a next step with the owning team. Each finding brings estimated impact, risk and missing signals into one review.

Explore the working sample →
Conceptual clockwise workflow: 1 source evidence and estimated opportunity, 2 customer review, 3 external implementation by the customer, 4 supporting measurement and verification, which may remain inconclusive.
  1. 1 · Source evidence and estimated opportunity
  2. 2 · Customer review and decision
  3. 3 · Implementation outside Costframe
  4. 4 · Measurement and verification
Conceptual workflow. Your team controls external changes. Estimates, implementation and verified savings are distinct.
Illustrative evidence reviewExisting public sample · not customer data

Sizing investigation

vm-build-07

Needs review

Observed CPU

22% sample peak

Fourteen daily CPU readingsPublic sample readings range from 5 to 22 percent. Low CPU alone cannot establish a safe smaller size.
Day 114-day sample · not a capacity forecastDay 14

Not collected

  • Memory
  • Disk IOPS
  • Peak build requirements

Unavailable is not the same as passing.

Next: confirm the workload

Review memory, disk performance and peak build needs with Developer experience before testing a smaller size.

Build a sizing case with the owner.

The sample build VM has fourteen daily CPU readings, with a 22% peak. Its monthly estimate remains a review candidate because memory, IOPS and peak build requirements are missing.

Risk, confidence, evidence freshness and provider scope remain part of a finding. A missing signal is not a passing check.

Finding and evidence states
Explore the interactive public sample
Sizing reviewCPU · 14-day sample

Sandbox · vm-build-07

€1,090.00

Estimated per month · needs review

22% peak CPU · memory and IOPS not collected

  • Billing: €2,180.00 in September
  • CPU: 14-day sample
  • Memory and IOPS unavailable
  1. Estimated
  2. Approved
  3. Implemented
  4. Verified

Track the work from estimate to verified result.

Scroll horizontally to read all columns. Keyboard: focus the table and use the arrow keys.

From finding review to financial verification
StateWhat it establishesWhat remains
EstimatedA proposed impact with stated assumptionsEvidence, owner and risk review
ApprovedA customer decision for a defined scopeCustomer implementation and observation
ImplementedTrusted confirmation of the external changeProvider or billing verification
VerifiedThe applicable evidence contract has been satisfiedKeep currency, period and attribution limits

Review governance and allocation work too.

Governance, allocation, security and other review-first findings can require attention without a quantified saving. Provider suggestions remain separate from independently calculated or modeled Costframe findings.

Azure detection and review guides

Review the evidence with the owning team.

Connect with read-only access, then agree what deserves investigation before changing infrastructure.

Start with Costframe