Skip to content
Browse documentation
TrustReview1 min

AI governance

Review how AI explanations use permitted Costframe evidence, retain source limitations, and remain separate from customer decisions and verified outcomes.

On this page

  1. Check an advisor answer before using it
  2. Evidence remains authoritative
  3. Source and policy controls

Check an advisor answer before using it

Ask a specific question about a finding or cost record you can access. Open the cited records and compare their period, currency and resource with the answer.

If a cited source is missing or the answer cannot be reproduced, keep the conclusion unconfirmed and use the original record for the decision. Do not paste provider credentials or unrestricted exports into a prompt to fill a gap.

Evidence remains authoritative

AI may explain governed evidence and draft bounded language. Deterministic records, provider evidence, approval state, and verification results remain authoritative.

Source and policy controls

A usable AI output needs permitted sources, policy version, limitations, and an honest unavailable state when grounding is missing.

  • AI output cannot grant provider, tenant, billing, or administrative authority.
  • Raw credentials, unrestricted metadata, and hidden reasoning are not customer-facing evidence.
  • Drafts remain subject to the same role and approval gates as non-AI workflows.

Find your next task

Browse setup, operation and recovery guides ↗Recover from a failed connection, audit or export ↗Ask a question with the safe support reference ↗

Related docs