Skip to content
Browse documentation
TrustReview1 min

Security and governance checks

Understand what Costframe's security findings establish, how evidence gaps limit coverage, and why automated checks do not certify compliance.

On this page

  1. Use a control finding in a security review
  2. Evidence preparation, not certification
  3. Execution source
  4. Read-only provider posture
  5. Auditability

Use a control finding in a security review

Open the finding available to your workspace and identify the affected resource and control. Read the observed configuration, collection time and checks that could not be completed.

Ask the system owner to confirm the intended configuration before deciding on remediation. Keep any compliance assessment separate: a resource check does not certify your organization or replace an assessor's judgment.

Evidence preparation, not certification

Security checks are mapped to common control areas for evidence preparation. They are not SOC 2, PCI, HIPAA, CIS, or ISO certification claims.

Execution source

Checks run over latest completed audit snapshots and connection health. PASS means no violation was detected in available in-scope evidence.

Read-only provider posture

Provider adapters construct supported read clients. Costframe emits evidence and implementation guidance; it does not expose a provider write path.

Auditability

Authoritative administrative completion must come from trusted backend mutations or verified external events. Client-visible success alone is not authoritative.

Find your next task

Browse setup, operation and recovery guides ↗Recover from a failed connection, audit or export ↗Ask a question with the safe support reference ↗

Related docs